56. Moraldi B. Approaching gender and you can society diversity inside the looks image: Objectification theory while the a framework to own partnering ideas and grounding lookup. Sex Roles. (2010) –48. doi: /s11199-010-9824-0

58. Cwynar-Horta J. The fresh commodification of your own human body positive course towards the Instagram. Stream Cult Government Technol. (2016) 8:36–56. doi: 0/strm.v8i2.203

59. Evident Grams, Pettigrew S, Wright S, Pratt Try, Blane S, Biagioni N. Potential within the-classification techniques to raise children’s vegetable use. Bar Health Nutr. (2017) –nine. doi: /S136898001700012X

60. Beilharz F, Sukunesan S, Rossell SL, Kulkarni J, Evident G. Growth of a confident human anatomy visualize chatbot (KIT) with young adults and you may mothers/carers: qualitative appeal classification data. J Med Internet Res. (2021) 23:e27807. doi: seven

61. Matsangigou Meters, Otkhmezuri B, Ang CS, Avraamides M, Riva G, Gaggioli An excellent, et al. Today i am able to find me: making a multiple-user digital fact remote therapy for lbs and you can figure issues. Hum Comput Interac. (2020) –20. doi: 945

62. Mutale GJ, Dunn Good, Stiller J, Larkin Roentgen. Development of a body dissatisfaction scale testing tool. The latest College Psychol Bull. (2016) –57.

63. Blashill AJ. Gender roles, restaurants pathology, and the entire body dissatisfaction in the dudes: good meta-investigation. Continue reading →