brightwomen.net tr+litvanya-kadinlari En iyi posta sipariЕџi gelin yerleri

Sex Differences in Person Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested when you look at the 37 cultures

Sex Differences in Person Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested when you look at the 37 cultures

Bhattacharyya, A great., and you can Ghosh, B. N. 2012. Women in Indian I . t (IT) Sector: An excellent Sociological Investigation. IOSR Log out of Humanities and you can Societal Research (JHSS), step three (6): 45–52.

A peek at Sexual Possibilities and Person Development: How Spouse Choices molded Human nature

Borovecki, Good., Tozzo, P., Cerri, Letter., and you can Caenazzo, L. 2018. Social Eggs Cold lower than Societal Health Position: Just a health Facts or a ladies Best? A moral Case Study. Diary out of Public Health Lookup, 7(3): 1484.

Faddy, M.J., Gosden, Roentgen.G., Gougeon, A., Richardson, S.J., and you may Nelson, J. F. 1992. Accelerated Disappearance off Ovarian Hair follicles when you look at the Midlife: Implication to have Anticipating Menopause. Hum Reprod.10: 1342–six.

Feingold, A great. 1992. Gender Differences in Lover Choice Needs: A test of one’s Parental Financial support Design. Psychol Bull, 112 (1): 125–139.

Figure Needs: Contacts having Rater Physique and Sociosexuality

Fuller, C. J., and you can Narasimhan, H. 2008panionate Marriage in Asia: New Altering Matrimony Program for the a heart-Group Brahman Subcaste. Diary of the Regal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 14: 736–754.

Helle, S., Lummaa, V., and Jokela, J. 2008. Marrying Female 15 years More youthful Optimized Men’s room Evolutionary Fitness during the Historic Sami. Biology Emails, 4: 75–77.

Kenrick, D. T., and you will Keefe, R. C. 1992. Ages Choice inside Friends Reflect Sex Variations in Human Reproductive Steps. Behavioural and Attention Sciences, 15: 75–133. Continue reading