The latest survey contained step 3 bits. Region I integrated inquiries out-of socio-group study (age, number of studies, parity, familial money, industry, current marital status, sexual craft, history of HPV vaccination, and you will history of abnormal cervical cancer tumors assessment).

Region II made up of six questions about the prospective ladies who are going to be processed, ages first off, regularity, decades otherwise criteria to get rid of regarding assessment, and methods off examination. Just the members who had have you ever heard from HPV manage just do it to Part III and therefore assessed understanding of HPV from their sorts of (oncogenic or low-oncogenic), form out of sign and you can prevention.

Before the analysis, the newest survey from area II and you will region III in Thai variation was in fact considered, chatted about, and you will changed until opinion certainly 20 boffins who were all of the gynecologic oncologists (certain were writers in other parallel knowledge). The pros ranked every one of 19 concerns since the either ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘perhaps not relevant’. The thing-top Articles Authenticity Directory (I-CVI) is determined each product, therefore the Blogs Authenticity Index (CVI) is actually calculated by firmly taking the typical ratio out of fourteen questions relating to understanding of cervical cancer assessment and you may 5 questions regarding HPV. The fresh new CVI was step one for both elements of the latest questionnaire (S1 Dining table). Brand new accuracy are examined within the 30 women with the same attribute because participants. The brand new Cronbach’ alpha coefficients towards reliability were 0.819 to have information about cervical cancer tumors evaluating and you may 0.907 to possess understanding of HPV.

Analysis range

To your time out of planned colposcopy, the analysis secretary given pointers of one’s study toward female exactly who fulfilled introduction conditions. The ladies whom wanted to engage offered created advised consent and you will replied new survey alone themselves ahead of continuing so you can colposcopy.

Studies amassed for this data was in fact socio-demographic investigation (Part I of your own questionnaire), experience in cervical cancer examination (Part II), and you can knowledge of HPV (Area III).

Statistical data

The latest answers of knowledge on cervical malignant tumors testing and you may HPV was examined by the for every goods prior to scoring categorization. Right respond to is actually obtained once the 1 whereas ‘incorrect and you will being unsure of answer’ are obtained 0.

From 14 questions of cervical disease screening, feminine whoever rating was basically ? 10 was in fact randomly categorized as having ‘a great knowledge’ otherwise was basically regarded as having “not good studies”. To have expertise in HPV, female whoever answer try ‘never observed HPV’ have been omitted on the studies off HPV education.

Out-of 5 concerns, women whose score have been ? step three was basically regarded as with ‘a great experience with HPV’ normally while the ‘bad knowledge’. Out-of 19 concerns, feminine whose score were ? thirteen was basically classified since which have ‘an excellent complete knowledge’ or else once the ‘bad complete knowledge’.

All the studies were compiled into the a digital databases and you may examined having fun with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were utilized to analyze market analysis and you may was described since wide variety that have payment, imply with practical departure otherwise median with diversity. The newest organization ranging from for each varying and you can studies score was reviewed using simple linear regression. Exploratory model was developed into the multivariable analysis in addition to the details possibly about the data rating. The felt quantity of statistical benefits are a p-property value 0.05 or quicker.

Efficiency

Out of 500 women who https://getbride.org/da/varme-malaysiske-kvinder/ met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>